David Lee Wilson
September 2006
 |
The temple of Queen Hatshepsut, whose mummy
may soon be identified by CT
scan. |
Dr. Zahi Hawass, Secretary-General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA),
is a man who needs little rest. In July and August, anyone with the means fled
the nation’s capital to escape the summer heat, but Hawass continued his daily
regime of excavation, reclamation and restoration of Egypt’s ancient treasures -
and he has planned an exciting last few months of 2006 to cap it all off.
On my last visit to Hawass’ office, I was greeted by a waiting room brimming
with people waiting for appointments with the Egyptologist: contingents from the
National Geographic Society, Discovery Channel and AUC Press, plus various
special project managers and an impressive number of SCA staff weaving their way
in and out of his office for signatures, instructions and general guidance on
how to get things done. Amidst these daily responsibilities, Hawass paused for
an exclusive interview to let Egypt Today readers in on some of his most
significant plans for the SCA in the coming months.
At the moment, the endeavor closest to Hawass’ heart is a massive
mummy-cataloging project, which will hopefully have its first phase completed by
the end of this year. The entire world of archeology is watching to see how
Egypt pulls off this feat - and is waiting to find out if one of the mummies in
the Egyptian Museum is actually the famous Queen Hatshepsut.
 |
| Dr. Zahi Hawass |
 |
| Dr. Hawass
descending into the burial chamber discovered between the back of the Sphinx
and the second pyramid. |
 |
| Indicating
where the shawabti were found. |
 |
| View of the
shawabti. |
 |
| Cecelia
(owner of Egypt & Beyond) examining the shawabti. |
Hawass: We are going to accomplish a lot before the end of this year, but the
most important thing that we are starting is actually going to be called the
Egyptian Mummy Project. As you know, non-royal mummies are scattered everywhere.
No one has ever tried to make a database or tried to document all of these
mummies, and, for the first time, we will do this. This will cover the mummies
held in the [Egyptian, Greco-Roman], National, Luxor and Mummification museums
as well as in all other sites around Egypt.
There are many sites in Egypt with mummies that no one knows anything about.
This project will also take a sample of the mummies and do CT scans on each one.
The largest part of the project, which will come later, will be that we will
open a museum for all non-royal mummies in Fustar. Many of these mummies are
currently in storage houses and offices and things like that in very bad
condition.
The second mummy project we will complete is the study on royal mummies. We
will start with two mummies in particular that have never had CT scans done on
them. In 1906, Howard Carter found two mummies inside KV6O. One was on the
ground, and the second one was in a coffin. The coffin had an inscription with
the last three letters of the name of the wet nurse to Queen Hatshepsut, and so
naturally they believed that this mummy was that of Queen Hatshepsut's wet
nurse.
Most believe that the second mummy in KV60 is the mummy of Hatshepsut. Now
there is not one single photograph that you can see of the second mummy since it
moved to the [Egyptian Museum in Cairo]. At the time I was lecturing at the
Metropolitan Museum about Hatshepsut, I spent a lot of time looking at this
mummy. I noticed that her hands were placed on her chest in a royal fashion. I
also found that the size of this mummy was about one-and-a-half meters, and the
size of the coffin was two meters, so I believe that KV60 was for the mummy of
the wet nurse of Queen Hatshepsut.
Hatshepsut always wanted the people that were near to her to be buried beside
her.
In the time of the third intermediate period, when there was destruction of
the mummies from Dynasty 21, the temple priests began to move the mummies from
tomb to tomb to save them. In my opinion, the mummy of Hatshepsut was probably
moved from KV20 to KV60. Perhaps people put the mummy of Hatshepsut in this
coffin to protect her. Next month, we will do a very important CT scan of the
two mummies and we will try to find anything we can that will lead to the truth.
We are thinking about DNA but the problem with ancient DNA is that there are
mistakes about 40 percent of the time. Maybe we will try an experiment with an
Egyptian team, an experiment with the mummy of Tuthmosis II and with the mummy
of Hatshepsut. If they are related, maybe this will prove it.
We will also do CT scans of famous mummies, like "[unknown] man E" that no
one knows anything about. We will do CT scanning of the mummies of Tuthmosis III
and Ramses II.
Meanwhile, we have opened a second mummy room at the Cairo Museum and, in
2008, we will open the museum in Fustar. We have a big area for mummies, but the
mummies will be shown for education and not for thrills. We will have Ramses II
in one room, and we will write the history of Ramses II and all of the building
construction that he did in his lifetime, and at the end we will show the CT
scan. People will learn about the mummies - I don’t believe that mummies should
be shown for a thrill.
The third project on Hawass' list to launch by the end of the year is another
series of tomb excavations at Saqqara. With the worldwide media frenzy unleashed
by last year's discovery of KV63, the first unopened tomb discovered in the
Valley of the Kings in over 80 years, you can count on Hawass' latest unveiling
to be an international sensation.
We actually discovered two tombs at Saqqara. The first one was in the shadow
of the second pyramid and near the causeway of the third pyramid. At the end of
the causeway, we discovered that the Egyptians of Dynasty 4 found that the
causeway was broken. They began to repair the north side of it, and they made
that restoration with stone rubble. So we asked, “Why did they do that?" Because
there was a tomb and they sealed the end of the tomb with the stone rubble!
This is the project that I will begin next. I believe that this is the tomb
of a nobleman and I am hoping that it will be intact.
You know, I always try to go to the top of the Great Pyramid to see new
things. When you go to a higher place your eyes become like a screen and you can
see things that you cannot see when you are walking on the ground. From the top
of the Great Pyramid I looked at the area between the back of the Sphinx and the
second pyramid. This area has evidence of tombs that date to the late period of
Dynasty 26. This was an important period for the Pyramids because there were the
priests of Khufu who maintained his cult and we have evidence that Khufu was
worshipped as a god in the twenty-sixth Dynasty.
I began the excavation in this area and I found a tomb. We excavated the
shaft down about 30 feet [nine meters], and at the end of 30 feet, I found six
rooms cut into the rock and, in one of them, a wooden box that contained 400
shawabti. Shawabti are the small statuettes that [Ancient Egyptians] left by the
body of the deceased to answer the questions in the afterlife. We did not go all
the way down to the burial chamber. I assume that the burial chamber goes down
another 20 feet [six meters], and we are hoping that this could be another
intact tomb. This will all be done in 2006.
The third project will take Hawass back to the very beginning of his career in
Egyptology and could yield the most important of all of the SCA chief's finds.
Another thing that will happen in 2006 started for me when I was a young man.
When I began my career, I was working in Luxor, and I met this man whose name
was Sheholly. Sheholly was the last member of the famous Abdul Rasul family. One
of the members of this family actually found the tomb of King Tut. This family
found a cache of mummies in 1871, and they entered this cache only three times
in 10 years. They never told anyone about it until the Egyptian government found
it.
This Sheholly was the owner of a hotel called the Al-Basem Hotel, and I would
speak with him often. One day, he said that he wanted to show me a secret. He
took me to the tomb of Seti I, and he said, This shaft goes down for 300 feet,
and, at the end of the shaft, I feel that the sacred burial tomb of Seti is
there. One day, you will be an important archeologist and maybe you can help
us.”
Later, I learned that what they found in this place was a sarcophagus with
only a single piece of mummified ox in it. There were no major artifacts found
there at all. Last year, I began to look into what this man told me thirty-five
years ago. I took a very thick rope and tied it at the beginning of the shaft. I
took a measuring tape and a flashlight, and I went down the shaft and had a
wonderful adventure. It took me about six hours, and I went down 270 feet. I
couldn’t go any further because the stone rubble from the shaft began to fall in
on me. I came back up and decided that this will be the year that I start making
documentation of this shaft and maybe we will discover something important.
Any endeavor relying as much on personality as it does on knowledge and
ability will produce some interesting characters. This is especially true in the
world of archeology.
Hawass isn't always popular, and he can be the best friend or the worst enemy
of any archeologist, curator or academic who hopes to center his or her work on
Egypt's ancient treasures. He demands respect for these antiquities, for the SCA
and for himself. He will suffer no fools, and this occasionally leads to
confrontation, something Hawass doesn't apologise for. His attempt to have some
of Egypt's stolen treasures returned, even if only temporarily, is a case in
point.
Some people say that I am severe in my attitude - they are correct. I have to
be.
I will you one example. We decided to celebrate 100 years of German
archeology in Egypt. I proposed a conference to take place in November of 2007
and offered to make an exhibit to show what they have found here in Egypt.
In front of the president of Germany, I said, "I hope, Mr. President, that we
can have the bust of Nefertiti as a loan for three months. In return, we will
give Germany a masterpiece - perhaps even better than this one - for three
months." They refused! This is why next year, we will make it an international
mission with the support of the archeological community.
I was not asking for everything to come back - not at all. I was asking for
the unique pieces to come back on loan, so that they can be seen by the Egyptian
people who never travel. Because I was refused, my strategy now is not to have
it for a loan, but to have it back - period.
Therefore I am inviting the countries that have rich archeological heritages
- China, Greece, Mexico, Italy, Syria and Lebanon — and we will meet in Cairo.
Every country will come with a list of the unique pieces that remain outside of
their countries that they want back. We will, all of us, create an international
list, and we will gain the support of the world, and I am sure chat we will win
these objects back! [ Back to top ] |